Space Shuttle Science Proves Comet Caused Tunguska ExplosionThis is a featured page

The mysterious 1908 Tunguska explosion that leveled 830 square miles of Siberian forest was almost certainly caused by a comet entering the Earth's atmosphere, says new Cornell University research. The conclusion is supported by an unlikely source: the exhaust plume from the NASA space shuttle launched a century later.

The research, accepted for publication (June 24, 2009) by the journal Geophysical Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union, connects the two events by what followed each about a day later: brilliant, night-visible clouds, or noctilucent clouds, that are made up of ice particles and only form at very high altitudes and in extremely cold temperatures.

"It's almost like putting together a 100-year-old murder mystery," said Michael Kelley, the James A. Friend Family Distinguished Professor of Engineering at Cornell who led the research team. "The evidence is pretty strong that the Earth was hit by a comet in 1908." Previous speculation had ranged from comets to meteors.

The researchers contend that the massive amount of water vapor spewed into the atmosphere by the comet's icy nucleus was caught up in swirling eddies with tremendous energy by a process called two-dimensional turbulence, which explains why the noctilucent clouds formed a day later many thousands of miles away.

Noctilucent clouds are the Earth's highest clouds, forming naturally in the mesosphere at about 55 miles over the polar regions during the summer months when the mesosphere is around minus 180 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 117 degrees Celsius).

The space shuttle exhaust plume, the researchers say, resembled the comet's action.

A single space shuttle flight injects 300 metric tons of water vapor into the Earth's thermosphere, and the water particles have been found to travel to the Arctic and Antarctic regions, where they form the clouds after settling into the mesosphere.

Kelley and collaborators saw the noctilucent cloud phenomenon days after the space shuttle Endeavour (STS-118) launched on Aug. 8, 2007. Similar cloud formations had been observed following launches in 1997 and 2003.

Following the 1908 explosion, known as the Tunguska Event, the night skies shone brightly for several days across Europe, particularly Great Britain -- more than 3,000 miles away.

Kelley said he became intrigued by the historical eyewitness accounts of the aftermath, and concluded that the bright skies must have been the result of noctilucent clouds. The comet would have started to break up at about the same altitude as the release of the exhaust plume from the space shuttle following launch. In both cases, water vapor was injected into the atmosphere.

The scientists have attempted to answer how this water vapor traveled so far without scattering and diffusing, as conventional physics would predict.

"There is a mean transport of this material for tens of thousands of kilometers in a very short time, and there is no model that predicts that," Kelley said. "It's totally new and unexpected physics."

This "new" physics, the researchers contend, is tied up in counter-rotating eddies with extreme energy. Once the water vapor got caught up in these eddies, the water traveled very quickly -- close to 300 feet per second.

Scientists have long tried to study the wind structure in these upper regions of the atmosphere, which is difficult to do by such traditional means as sounding rockets, balloon launches and satellites, explained Charlie Seyler, Cornell professor of electrical engineering and paper co-author.

"Our observations show that current understanding of the mesosphere-lower thermosphere region is quite poor," Seyler said. The thermosphere is the layer of the atmosphere above the mesosphere.

The paper is also co-authored by physicist Miguel Larsen, Ph.D. '79, of Clemson University, and former student of Kelley. The work performed at Cornell was funded by the Atmospheric Science Section of the National Science Foundation.

On July 1, Kelley will give a lecture, "Two-dimensional Turbulence, Space Shuttle Plume Transport in the Thermosphere, and a Possible Relation to the Great Siberian Impact Event," at a plenary session of the annual meeting of Coupling, Energetics and Dynamics of Atmospheric Regions in Sante Fe, N.M.

Phantoms and Monsters


Denmaster
Denmaster
Latest page update: made by Denmaster , Jun 29 2009, 8:12 PM EDT (about this update About This Update Denmaster Edited by Denmaster

669 words added

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
lancesergeant Tunguska 0 Jul 19 2009, 8:01 PM EDT by lancesergeant
Thread started: Jul 19 2009, 8:01 PM EDT  Watch
What is interesting and of note - the incidents the Soviets are revealing to the rest of the world shows that these incidents were happening before Roswell and the like. Before German discs, the Von Brauns and the rocket science. These incidents are taking place in the back end of beyond and reported by locals. These locals were more than likely wouldn't have seen a phone never mind a newspaper. So it appears to discount Soviet/German experimental satellites, spaceships/craft and the like. These sightings are pre-dating Western reports -they would have had nothing to compare them with!!!
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
lancesergeant Tunguska 0 Jul 19 2009, 7:55 PM EDT by lancesergeant
Thread started: Jul 19 2009, 7:55 PM EDT  Watch
This flies in the face of what was said on coast to coast am Soviet UFO incidents Paul Stonehill. He said that Tunguska was recorded as a UFO that had been fired on by another UFO, and that it had blown up in the air. UFO dogfight!! He said that the Soviets have recorded the incident. It is more than likely that the incident was recorded even though the area is pretty isolated, but then with the Czars and the arrival of Communism it has been kept quiet.

I sense that even though NASA has put forward that their explanation explains what actually happened, to me it is sheer hypothesis. The scientists are saying this hypothesis is the fact, I believe they are looking at something similar and saying this is also an example of what they have. If not why are the Soviets coming out with what happened, they were there and apparently it was recorded. Atmospheric influences is a big difference from a space ship being attacked and destroyed in mid-air!!! I think NASA has found something and said this explains that as well.

I far as I can recall there was no mention of radiation. The top Russian scientist who was investigating fell foul of the authorities and conveniently disappeared from view. What I would like to know is if it was a comet leaving that sort of damage wasn't it recorded by seismographs. Something landing and leaving damage like that is going to cause some seismic disturbance/anomalies. No one mentions anything. The Soviets say it was the loser in a dog fight. Where is the debris from the comet? If it is a spacecraft, was it vaporised by power supplies on board detonating, or its weapons payload?

If the Soviets start to open up and offer the findings/reports it will offer new insights on the phenomena.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)