2,000-Year-Old 'Jesus Box' May Not Be A FakeThis is a featured page

2,000-Year-Old 'Jesus Box' May Not Be A Fake - Phantoms and Monsters Wiki
A judge is set to throw out charges against experts accused of faking a stone box that claimed to offer the first physical proof of the existence of Christ - raising the possibility once again that it could be genuine.

The discovery of the 2,000-year-old ossuary, or bone box, bearing the words, 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus', was regarded as one of the greatest archaeological discoveries when it emerged nearly a decade ago.

But other experts decided the inscription on the 'priceless' limestone artefact had been added at a later date.

It was dismissed as a fake and Israeli authorities began criminal investigations.
But yesterday a three-year forgery trial in Israel was close to collapse, reopening the possibility it might indeed be the only tangible evidence for the life of Jesus.

Jerusalem judge Aharon Farkash told prosecutors trying Israeli collector Oded Golan: 'Have you really proved beyond a reasonable doubt that these artefacts are fakes as charged in the indictment?

'The experts disagree among themselves.

'Where is the evidence to show that Oded Golan faked them?'

The 20-inch long empty box, apparently found near the Mount of Olives, was sold to Golan by an Arab antiquities dealer.

Golan was arrested and, with four others, charged in 2004 with 18 counts of forgery, fraud and damaging archaeological artefacts.

They were accused of taking valuable objects and adding inscriptions to massively increase their value.

Charges against two men were dropped and only Golan and antiquities dealer Robert Deutsch, the alleged leaders of the forgery ring, remain on trial. They deny all charges.

Phantoms and Monsters
Wiki Home


Denmaster
Denmaster
Latest page update: made by Denmaster , Oct 31 2008, 9:32 PM EDT (about this update About This Update Denmaster Edited by Denmaster

267 words added
1 image added

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
cpepinc Well, hold on there 5 Jul 18 2009, 9:37 PM EDT by BunkieLA
Thread started: Nov 6 2008, 7:45 PM EST  Watch
Just because they might not have faked it does not mean it isn't a fake. There are cases of fakes going back to the begining of Christianity, remember Constatines mother (?) who found the one true cross, in a well! 300 years later and it was just sitting in a well. funny that! Anyway also back at this time, jesus and james were pretty common names, so all in all it proves very little. This would be an Incrediable find if true, but the jury is still out.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: bone box controversy fake
Show Last Reply
Showing 1 of 1 threads for this page

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)